“In fact, the whole interview with Greg Jenkins was very troublesome to me because it was so clear that he was seeking to put words in Judy’s mouth and demand an exactitude of answers that she was going to be unable to provide which he knew going in.” — Dr. James Fetzer on 02/06/07 regarding an interview conducted at the National Press Club on 01/10/07
As Dr. James Fetzer suggests, Dr. Judy Wood may be unable to provide answers to basic questions regarding her own speculative hypothesis. However, this paper does quantitatively analyze those issues raised during the interview as well as address other evidence advanced by Dr. Judy Wood and others that the WTC towers may have been destroyed by directed energy weapons. The following arguments will prove that the degree of implausibility places the hypothesis squarely in the realm of the impossible.
Dr. Wood’s hypothesis is predominantly based upon the premise that large amounts of debris were ‘missing’ from the post-collapse rubble. A detailed analysis clearly demonstrates that all the debris is accounted for if sublevel collapses are considered. This paper addresses the massive energy requirements, issues involving the use of directed energy weapons, and misinterpreted phenomena used to support the thesis such as the Richter scale measurements, Bathtub damage, holes in adjacent buildings, charred cars, etc.