The Journal of 9/11 Studies has published a major new article by David Booth: “Covid-19 as a structural deep event: Cutting to the chase on perpetrators and motives.”
Booth applies the concept of “structural deep events” — long used to analyze 9/11 and the JFK assassination — to the Covid-19 episode. While critics have documented the harms of lockdowns and fast-tracked mRNA products, Booth focuses on the still-unsettled question of who perpetrated the Covid operation and why.
After reviewing six leading hypotheses, Booth concludes that only one passes the tests of motive, means, and parsimony (i.e., the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions): the Covid episode was a “live-fire exercise” led by Western military and security forces, designed to normalize lockdown-until-vaccine policies and ensure the uptake of mRNA “countermeasures.” He argues that this explanation accounts for the striking synchronicity of pandemic responses across NATO and Five Eyes countries, the militarization of public health in the US, and the unprecedented legal immunities granted to pharmaceutical firms.
This paper builds on the Journal’s landmark 2024 publication, “A Plausibility Probe of 9/11 and Covid-19 as Structural Deep Events,” by Dr. Piers Robinson and Kevin Ryan, which first analyzed the deep event commonalities between 9/11 and Covid-19 using the principles of a “structured focused comparison.” Booth’s work takes the next step: attempting to identify the perpetrators and clarify their motives.
